05 September 2012
The Standing Committee of the House of Bishops has set out the
next steps in the Church of England's debate on Women
Bishops.
Following the decision of the General Synod on 9th July 2012 to
refer the matter back to the House of Bishops for further
consideration, the Standing Committee has met to consider the
options available when the House meets in Oxford on September
12.
At its meeting yesterday the committee considered all the
submissions received in response to a request for members of
General Synod and interested groups to suggest possible ways
forward, in addition to taking account of comments from the
Steering Committee responsible for taking the draft legislation
through the General Synod.
In total 120 submissions were received: 17 were from bishops, 33
from clergy members of the General Synod, 48 from lay members of
the Synod, 7 from groups and 15 from other individuals who do not
sit as members of Synod.
Of the seven options presented in the paper the two which received
the greatest level of support are options 1 and 2: retaining Clause
5(1)(c) in its present form or deleting it without replacement. 35
correspondents expressed a preference for retaining the provision
(option 1) and 41 for deleting it (option2). Option 3 attracted
relatively little support whilst options 4 to 7 attracted some
support and also some criticisms. In addition a few new options
were suggested by respondents.
In terms of groups representing particular opinions on this issue
the submissions from WATCH - advocating women in the episcopate -
firmly supported Option2 whilst Reform and the Catholic Group -
opposing women in the episcopate - firmly favoured option 1.
Having considered and discussed the submissions received, the
Standing Committee resolved to invite the House of Bishops to
consider the Committee's assessment of the seven options in GS Misc
1033 and of the additional suggestions received during the
consultation process .Members of the House have the right to table
amendments before 5pm on Tuesday September 11th.
The amendments will be voted upon at the meeting of the House of
Bishops by simple majority. If no amendment were passed the
draft Measure would return to the General Synod unchanged (option 1
from GS Misc 1033).
The amendments that the Standing Committee has suggested for
discussion in the light of the consultation are as follows:
- (Option 2 from GS Misc 1033) Delete clause 5(1)(c)-
- (Option 4 from GS Misc 1033) Substitute for the words in clause
5(1)(c):
"the selection, after consultation with parochial church
councils who issue Letters of Request under section 3, of male
bishops and male priests to exercise ministry in the parishes of
those councils,"
- (New option suggested by a Synod member) Substitute for the
words in clause 5(1)(c):
" the selection of male bishops and male priests in
a manner which respects the grounds on which parochial church
councils issue Letters of Request under section 3,".
- (Option 5 from GS Misc 1033) Substitute for the words in clause
5(1)(c):
"the selection, following consultation with parochial church
councils who issue Letters of Request under section 3, of male
bishops and male priests, the exercise of ministry by whom
appears to the persons making the selection to be appropriate for
the parishes concerned,".
- (Option 6 from GS Misc 1033) Substitute for the words in clause
5(1)(c):
"the selection of male bishops and male priests the exercise
of ministry by whom respects the position, in relation to the
celebration of the sacraments and other divine service and the
provision of pastoral care, of the parochial church councils who
issue Letters of Request under section 3,".
The General Synod will vote on the draft Measure at its meeting
in London on 19-21 November.
Notes:
The discussion document GS Misc 1033 was issued on 25 July and
set out 7 options making clear that these were not an exhaustive
list:
Option 1- Retention of Clause 5(1)(c) in its current form.
Option 2 - Deletion of Clause 5(1)(c).
Option 3 - Replacement of "consistent with" by "respect" or
"take account of".
Option 4 - Focus on broad subject area and perhaps process.
Option 5 - Focus on suitability/appropriateness.
Option 6 - Revised formulation of what parishes need (inserting
references to the position of PCCs in relation to the celebration
of the sacraments etc).
Option 7 - Option 6 plus some process.