Section 2.7: Clergy - Pre-appointment Checks

Guidance  

Why? 

Carrying out pre-appointment checks is important for safeguarding children, young people and vulnerable adults as it helps a church body to establish a more rounded picture of the candidate’s suitability to work with these groups. 

If at any point during this process a discrepancy is highlighted in the information provided by the applicant, they should be given the opportunity to explain the discrepancy.  Examples could be dates of employment or reasons for leaving provided on an application form differing to those received on a reference.  It is a good idea to keep a written record of such clarifications.  

Whilst reference checking plays an important part in the pre-appointment checks process, sometimes references can provide limited information and therefore it is important to consider what else can be done to build up as true and rounded picture of the applicant as possible. 

How? 

Clergy Current Status Letter (CCSL) including the Episcopal Reference  

Where a priest or deacon is being considered for appointment to a post and that person currently holds, or most recently held, a post in another diocese, or is serving in the Armed Forces, the bishop of the ‘receiving’ diocese should apply to the bishop of the ‘sending’ diocese for a CCSL.  

Employment/Volunteering/Education References 

This type of reference should be sought directly from the relevant organisation, including overseas where relevant, not an applicant’s colleague and ideally be provided on headed paper to verify the legitimacy of the organisation providing it. If received via email, it should be sent from a verified (as far as possible) business email address. 

Details requested should include: 

• Where the individual has been employed/volunteered/studied; 

• The dates of employment/volunteering, or duration of study; 

• The position held, or study undertaken; 

• Individual’s suitability to work with children, young people or vulnerable adults; 

• Any concerns about the individual working with children, young people or vulnerable adults; 

• Any substantiated allegations, disciplinary warnings, including time-expired warnings, in relation to working with children, young people and vulnerable adults; 

• The reasons for leaving employment, voluntary work, training or study (if known). 

Church bodies should consider reserving the right to contact any one of the applicant's current/previous employment, volunteering or education contacts in case of any anomalies or discrepancies. 

Personal References 

Personal references should only be sought as a last resort due to their limitations in terms of evidential effectiveness. Personal references might be sought from group/club leaders, mentors, neighbours, or family friends. The referee should know the person well and have up-to-date knowledge of them. 

Details requested should include: 

• How they know the individual; 

• How long they have known the individual; 

• An honest overview of the individual’s character; 

• Individual’s suitability to work with children, young people or vulnerable adults; 

• Any concerns about the individual working with children, young people or vulnerable adults; 

• Any knowledge of the individual being investigated over safeguarding issues. 

Verbal confirmation/verification 

It is recommended that wherever possible all written references are followed up with a telephone call, to verify the identity of the referee. Talking to referees when you have read the reference will give the opportunity to clarify any anomalies or discrepancies between the information that the referee has provided and the information that the applicant has given.  It is good practice to keep a note of the call - when it took place, who was involved, what was said – to be stored alongside the written reference received. 

Reference checking challenges 

References can sometimes prove difficult to obtain. If, despite best efforts, all required references have not been obtained or the minimum referencing period not covered, then it is recommended that church bodies document all efforts made to seek references and demonstrate a clear approach to how they addressed such challenges for each individual case. 

It is not unusual for written references to provide very limited information e.g. limited to confirmation of dates when someone worked at a particular organisation.  As detailed above, it is recommended that wherever possible, but particularly if such references are received, that a telephone conversation takes place as a follow up to the references received. 

There are a number of situations where people will struggle to provide a referee, e.g. if just leaving school, returning to work or volunteering after a break.  In these situations, the only possible references might come from friends and family, in which case they should always be followed up verbally and attempts to contact a previous teacher, employer or other contact made wherever possible. Similarly, we are aware that there are circumstances where the sending bishop – for reasons unrelated to the character or conduct of the individual concerned – will not provide a reference in line with the usual procedure.  In these circumstances, it is important to note the steps that were undertaken to try and obtain a reference, that other sources of reference were explored and taken up (including a verbal follow up where possible), and that adequate risk management processes are in place on appointment. 

Timing of reference requests 

There may be occasions when taking up references after short listing and before interview may be advantageous.  If a church body decides to do this, then they must ensure all appropriate consents from the applicant are in place for the referee to be approached and this must be stated in the Privacy Notice.